APPROACH · HOW AN ENGAGEMENT RUNS

FROM AN OPERATING PROBLEM
TO A working system.

We start with the cost or delay you need to reduce. Then we scope the work, agree a measure, and review results before each further investment.

Illustrative program timing. We agree scope and dates for each engagement.

PHASE 01 OF 04 · MONTHS 1–3

Discovery and strategy

We walk through the process with the people doing it, measure the cost or delay, and check what the data can support.

DELIVERABLES
A proposed scope, a business owner, a baseline, and an estimate of costs and benefits.
GATE 01 · DEFINE — Is there a sound case to proceed?
The problem has an owner and a credible benefit. We know how to get the data and what it will cost.
PHASE 02 OF 04 · MONTHS 2–9

Foundations and validation

We connect the data, settle conflicting definitions, and test the assumptions most likely to change the business case.

DELIVERABLES
Usable data, prototype results where needed, and a revised estimate of the work and its value.
GATE 02 · VALIDATE — Does the evidence support the investment?
Tests meet the agreed criteria on representative data. Finance has reviewed the benefit and the full delivery and operating cost.
PHASE 03 OF 04 · MONTHS 3–9

Production delivery

We build and test with users, prepare support, and release the system. We check whether people can do the intended job with it.

DELIVERABLES
A working application, trained users, a support owner, and performance tracked against the baseline.
GATE 03 · DELIVER — Is the system ready for sustained use?
Users can complete the intended tasks, acceptance tests pass, and support is ready. Results have been measured over the agreed period.
PHASE 04 OF 04 · MONTHS 9–24+

Expansion and handover

We assess the next sites and adapt the system where needed. Your team takes on more engineering and support using the code and procedures developed together.

DELIVERABLES
Reusable code and procedures, with your team ready to lead the next rollout.
GATE 04 · EXPAND — Is the business ready to extend the system?
Results justify the next rollout. The receiving sites have the data, people, and support capacity to use it.
OWNERSHIP

Your team takes the lead as we build.

Your engineers and analysts help build the first use case, then take on more development, release, and support responsibility.

FIRST USE CASE
OPERATEIQ
Leads delivery
YOUR TEAM
Helps design, build, and test
SECOND USE CASE
OPERATEIQ
Shares delivery responsibility
YOUR TEAM
Leads selected parts of delivery
THIRD USE CASE
OPERATEIQ
Reviews and supports
YOUR TEAM
Leads the agreed delivery work
FIG. 02 — EXAMPLE PROGRESSION, THREE USE CASES
ILLUSTRATIVE REVIEW DECISIONS

Decide whether to keep investing.

We compare results with the business case and decide whether to proceed, change scope, wait, or stop. These examples show why.

Downtime prediction03 · DELIVERProduction acceptance is complete and results meet the agreed criteria.PROCEED
Invoice matching02 · VALIDATEMatch quality improves on the baseline and finance supports the case.PROCEED
Demand forecast rebuild02 · VALIDATETesting shows too little improvement over the existing method to justify the cost.STOP
Vision-based quality inspection01 · DEFINEInspection images are missing. The site needs a way to collect them first.DEFER
FIG. 03 — ILLUSTRATIVE, NOT A CLIENT RECORD

Get your program moving.

Tell us what has shipped, what is stuck, and what needs to happen next.

EXPLORE THE DATA FOUNDATIONS →